Statement on Monetary Policy – February 20252. Economic Conditions

Summary

  • Global trade policy uncertainty has increased in an environment of already elevated geopolitical risks. The new US administration has announced tariffs on Canada and Mexico, implemented additional tariffs on China, and indicated that it will levy tariffs on the European Union. It has also said it will introduce reciprocal tariffs that could directly affect many economies and announced new tariffs on all steel and aluminium imports. Some targeted jurisdictions have indicated their willingness to retaliate, with China imposing new tariffs on a number of US exports.
  • Economic growth in the United States has been surprisingly robust, whereas the recovery in several other advanced economies has been more gradual than expected. Disinflation has continued in line with, or slightly ahead of expectations across most advanced economies since the November Statement. Economic activity in China strengthened towards the end of 2024, with the economy achieving the authorities’ growth target of 5 per cent.
  • Since the November Statement, data on domestic output and inflation have been a little softer than expected, while labour market data have been stronger than expected. Our assessment is that overall conditions in the labour market remain tight – as evidenced by elevated growth in labour costs and by firms across a range of industries reporting ongoing difficulties finding suitable labour. At the same time, the recent easing in inflation at a time of subdued growth in activity suggests that firms’ profit margins may have been compressed or capacity pressures may have eased in some parts of the economy, including the housing market.
  • Underlying inflation eased in the December quarter. Trimmed mean inflation was 0.5 per cent in the quarter and 3.2 per cent over the year. There has been a broad-based easing in underlying inflation over the past year, though temporary factors have also contributed. Services inflation eased but remains elevated alongside ongoing cost pressures.
  • Headline inflation eased to 2.4 per cent in year-ended terms, remaining below underlying inflation. This mostly reflects the impact of changes to government subsidies to households, which lowered year-ended headline inflation by around 0.6 percentage points.
  • Price pressures in both new and established housing markets have eased considerably compared with six months earlier, as growth in underlying demand has eased. New dwelling investment has been relatively steady over the past year as weaker demand for new building has been offset by support from the existing pipeline of dwelling construction. Liaison contacts report that builders are offering discounts in some cities in response to weak demand and amid improved labour availability for some tradespeople, which has led to an unexpected easing in new dwelling inflation. Inflation in advertised rents has also continued to moderate and by more than expected.
  • The easing in labour market conditions since late 2022 has stalled, and some key indicators suggest that conditions tightened a little in late 2024. The unemployment rate edged lower in the December quarter to be around the same level as in mid-2024, and the underemployment rate has declined since May. Also, overall employment growth remains strong, largely owing to the health care industry, and continues to outpace population growth.
  • Quarterly wages growth remained steady over 2024. Private sector wages growth eased gradually over the first half of the year in quarterly terms but was unchanged in the September quarter, consistent with our view that the labour market remains tight. Public sector wages growth has been volatile in recent quarters but continues to show underlying strength, partly in response to inflation outcomes over recent years. Unit labour cost growth has also eased but remains higher than is consistent with inflation being sustainably at target.
  • GDP growth remained well below estimates of potential growth over the year to the September quarter, though quarterly growth looks to have picked up more recently. While growth in overall private demand was subdued in the September quarter, household consumption (excluding the effect of energy rebates) increased alongside growth in real household disposable incomes; partial indicators suggest that consumption growth picked up further in the December quarter. Public demand has continued to grow strongly in recent quarters. Measured productivity declined further in the September quarter; weakness in productivity is weighing on supply, contributing to ongoing capacity and cost pressures despite subdued growth in overall demand.

2.1 Global economic conditions

Elevated geopolitical risks and global policy uncertainty are creating a challenging economic environment.

Global trade policy uncertainty has increased and is adding to broader policy uncertainty (Graph 2.1). The tariff policies of the new US administration are evolving rapidly, with a wide range of outcomes possible. Other economies’ responses to potential tariffs also add to the uncertainty. In addition, changes to fiscal and immigration policies and deregulation are under active consideration by the US administration and have the potential to materially affect the US growth and inflation outlook if implemented, with likely spillovers to the global economy including Australia (see Chapter 3: Outlook). Uncertainty about the outlook for policy is also elevated in major economies outside the United States, with elections underway or anticipated in Europe, Asia and Canada, and uncertainty about the fiscal policy outlook in China. While financial markets are currently pricing in benign policy impacts, particularly in the United States (see Box A: Implications of US Policy Settings for Financial Markets), uncertainty is creating a challenging environment for businesses and households.

Graph 2.1
A single line chart showing the share of articles discussing trade policy uncertainty. The share is below 0.5% for most of the period between 1980 and 2013. The share spikes to 2.5% during the period between 2018 to 2020 before falling back to 0.5%. In 2025 the share spikes again to above 3%.

These developments are taking place against a backdrop in which US growth has been surprisingly robust, whereas the recovery in several other advanced economies has been more gradual than expected.

US GDP growth remained robust and surprised to the upside relative to Consensus forecasts at the time of the November Statement. Quarterly growth slowed slightly in the December quarter, but by less than previously expected; consumption and real income growth remained solid. Timely indicators such as surveyed business conditions are still pointing to overall strong growth (Graph 2.2). Business investment intentions have also continued to improve in recent months, consistent with expectations for changes to US tax policies and deregulation. US labour market conditions appear to have stabilised at a level consistent with the Federal Reserve’s assessment of full employment, and earlier downside risks of a deterioration in the labour market have diminished substantially. Stronger-than-expected employment growth over recent months has supported a slight decrease in the unemployment rate despite an uptick in labour force participation.

Graph 2.2
A two panel line graph showing economic activity indicators for Australia and the United States, compared to a range of other advanced economies. The left panel shows GDP per capita has been increasing in the United States since the end of 2019, but has been decreasing over this period in other economies including Australia (which sits at the top of the range of other economies). The right panel shows the Purchasing Managers’ Index for the services sector across the same group of countries. The index for the US has declined sharply recently, but remains well above the level in Australia and other advanced economies.

Growth in other advanced economies remains sluggish. GDP growth in the euro area and Sweden slowed slightly in the December quarter and was weaker than expected at the time of the November Statement. Partial data point to weaker growth in the United Kingdom as well. Consistent with ongoing weakness in GDP growth, labour markets have continued to ease in most peer economies as growth in demand for labour remains low. Business conditions also remain subdued, and, despite solid income growth, consumption growth remains subdued in most of these economies. By contrast, earlier cuts to policy rates in Canada and Sweden appear to be starting to support a pick-up in employment and consumption growth in these economies.

Disinflation has progressed mostly in line with, or faster than, expectations, but prospective US tariffs pose new upside risks to US inflation in particular.

Underlying inflation has continued to ease in most advanced economies, and in some cases has declined more quickly than expected (Graph 2.3). Non-housing services inflation – which is most closely tied to domestic economic conditions – has continued to ease, and on a quarterly basis is now close to historical averages in several economies. Housing services disinflation has been slower, although rental inflation appears to have passed its peak in most countries and leading indicators point to further easing. Goods inflation has continued to increase gradually and is generally at around its historical average. The prospect of additional US tariffs presents an upside risk to goods inflation there and – together with recent strong growth and inflation data and prospects of more stimulatory fiscal policy – has raised the US inflation outlook. The stronger US inflation outlook has seen both market-based measures of inflation expectations and policy rate expectations revised up in the United States (see Chapter 1: Financial Conditions). Elsewhere, inflation risks are more balanced. Some central banks (such as the Riksbank, Bank of Canada and European Central Bank) view inflation as having returned sustainably to target, or being close to doing so, and consistently undershooting the inflation target remains a risk in those economies if growth does not pick up.

Graph 2.3
A dot-bar graph showing the difference between six-month annualised core inflation and inflation targets across a number of advanced economies, both now and six months ago. The deviation from target now is smaller than it was six months ago across all of the included economies. Core inflation is furthest above target in the United Kingdom; Australia sits in the middle of the sample.

Economic activity in China strengthened towards the end of 2024.

China achieved its 5 per cent year-average growth target in 2024, following strong growth in the December quarter and upward revisions to growth in previous quarters. Net exports made a significant contribution to growth in the December quarter, in part reflecting a large pick-up in merchandise exports to the United States in December as US importers brought forward shipments ahead of expected tariff increases. Growth in consumption also strengthened, supported by government subsidies to trade in durable goods including cars and appliances (Graph 2.4). Authorities have announced further fiscal stimulus measures aimed at boosting consumption, such as an expansion in the range of consumer durable goods eligible for household subsidies and civil servant pay increases. Robust growth in the manufacturing and infrastructure sectors continued to offset the drag from declining real estate investment.

Graph 2.4
A combined line and bar graph showing Chinese quarter-on-quarter GDP growth with contributions from consumption, investment, net exports and a seasonal adjustment residual. The line shows quarter-on-quarter GDP growth increased to be 1.6 per cent in the December quarter of 2024. The bars show the largest contribution to growth in the December quarter was from consumption, followed by net exports and investment.

Conditions in the Chinese housing market have improved after recent policy support, but they remain weak and there are still headwinds to a sustained recovery. National new housing sales in December were 8 per cent above their recent trough, and their prices increased for the first time in over a year. However, the pick-up in new housing sales has been concentrated in a few larger cities, and Chinese developers remain under significant financial pressure, limiting their ability to begin new work. New housing starts are yet to pick up materially and land purchases by developers remain at very low levels.

Commodity market sentiment has been resilient despite concerns about the outlook for Chinese growth, including from higher US tariffs. Iron ore prices have increased, though they remain well below levels seen in recent years. Coking coal prices have declined, though this partly reflects strong production growth in China (Graph 2.5). The impact of tariffs on steel and aluminium imports announced by the US administration on iron ore and bauxite prices is uncertain but likely small, as is the impact on Australian exports of these commodities.

Graph 2.5
A single panel line graph showing movements in iron ore and coking coal prices. Iron ore prices have increased a little over recent months, while coking coal prices have declined slightly. Prices for both commodities declined over 2024 and are now well below their average level from 2021 to 2022.

2.2 Domestic economic activity

Australian GDP growth picked up a little in the September quarter, but remained below estimates of potential growth.

GDP growth was 0.3 per cent in the September quarter, a touch below our expectations in the November Statement of 0.4 per cent (Graph 2.6). The ABS also downwardly revised growth slightly over the preceding three quarters, such that year-ended GDP growth was 0.2 percentage points lower than had been expected in November; the revisions suggest that momentum in domestic activity earlier in 2024 had been a little weaker than previously thought. Partial indicators suggest that quarterly GDP growth picked up further in the December quarter, led by an increase in household consumption. Recent flooding in North Queensland will weigh on economic activity in the affected regions in the March quarter but the effects are not expected to be large enough to impact aggregate GDP growth.

Graph 2.6
A single panel line and bar graph showing quarterly and year-ended GDP growth in Australia. GDP growth increased a little in September quarter 2024 but has continued to slow in year-ended terms.

Public demand has grown strongly in recent quarters. Recent growth in public consumption largely reflects an increase in the provision of government services as well as subsidies to households. Public investment also grew strongly in the September quarter, more than reversing a decline earlier in the year, although much of this strength reflected import-intensive spending on defence projects. Private demand picked up a little in the September quarter, but growth remained subdued. Abstracting from the effect of electricity rebates, household consumption picked up modestly but by a little less than expected, alongside growth in real household disposable income following the Stage 3 tax cuts. New dwelling investment was relatively flat over the year and growth in business investment has moderated sharply from the rapid growth rates seen in recent years.

Export growth was weaker than expected over the year to the September quarter, largely driven by services exports. Education exports were weaker than expected due to a tightening in student visa requirements and an unexpected decline in the average expenditure of international students. The ABS upwardly revised the level of imports over recent years to reflect greater use of digital services, though offsetting upward revisions to household consumption left GDP little changed.

Underlying household consumption growth edged up in the September quarter and has shown signs of picking up further in December.

While household consumption was unchanged in the September quarter, underlying consumption growth – which strips out the effect of energy rebates from household spending – picked up. This increase in underlying consumption was consistent with the pick-up in real disposable income growth seen in this period, as the Stage 3 tax cuts reduced income tax payable. Analysis suggests that households typically spend around 20 to 30 cents of every extra dollar of income (such as due to a tax cut) over the following year or so. While consumption growth in the September quarter was broadly as expected, growth over the year was weaker than expected following historical data revisions (see Box B: Consumption and Income Since the Pandemic).

Timely indicators suggest that consumption growth increased a little further in the December quarter, although evolving seasonal spending patterns are making it difficult to gauge underlying momentum (Graph 2.7). It remains uncertain how much of the recent strength in the partial indicators reflects price-sensitive consumers concentrating spending around sales events in the December quarter or a genuine improvement in underlying momentum following the earlier stabilisation of real income growth and the boost to incomes from the Stage 3 tax cuts. Our current assessment is that the December quarter outcome reflects a bit of both; the pick-up in growth in categories not impacted by late-November Black Friday sales (such as eating out, transport, and recreation and culture) provides some evidence that underlying momentum has improved. Liaison contacts generally expect little change in conditions over coming months, with demand expected to be boosted by any interest rate cuts. Contacts continue to report that consumers remain price sensitive, and this is expected to persist for some time.

Graph 2.7
A line graph showing household consumption indicators. The graph shows the ABS HSI and Retail sales in three-month-on-three-month growth rates. The two series have broadly tracked each other since 2021 and both series show a pick up in the December quarter.

The level of business investment has stabilised, and firms expect it to remain relatively steady over 2025.

The level of business investment was broadly unchanged over the year to the September quarter, although there were notable differences across components. Non-mining construction and machinery and equipment investment has been steady in recent quarters. By contrast, non-mining software investment has continued to grow strongly, while mining investment has declined. As of the September quarter last year, firms were expecting investment over 2024/25 to remain around similar levels to last financial year, although their expectations could be affected by international developments. Further out, growth in investment is expected to be supported by the large pipeline of renewable energy investment as the Australian energy sector decarbonises, investment in data centres as Australian businesses continue to migrate services to the cloud and take up artificial intelligence, and investment in computer software and related products.

Growth in both housing prices and advertised rents has been subdued in recent months, following a slowing in underlying demand for housing.

A further increase in average household size and a slowing in population growth have contributed to subdued growth in advertised rents (Graph 2.8). Advertised rents inflation has eased noticeably since July 2024 in monthly terms and this has contributed to an easing in CPI rents inflation (see section 2.4 Inflation). In the December quarter, advertised rents were relatively flat in Sydney and Melbourne. Advertised rents continued to increase in Adelaide, Perth and Brisbane, but at a slower pace than earlier in the year.

Graph 2.8
A line graph showing how average household size has evolved by location since 1998. Average household size has declined nationally, and within combined capital cities and regional areas over the longer term. Average household size reached series lows during the pandemic, both nationally and in combined capital cities, but increased over 2024.

New dwelling investment has been relatively steady over the past year, although the level has been revised higher. Relatively weak demand for new buildings has been offset by support from the pipeline of dwellings to be completed; the pipeline of dwellings has continued to decline gradually but remains much higher than prior to the pandemic amid ongoing capacity constraints for tradespeople employed towards the end of the construction process (e.g. plasterers and tilers) (Graph 2.9). Liaison contacts report that builders are offering discounts in some cities in response to weak demand, which has contributed to an unexpected easing in new dwelling inflation (see section 2.4 Inflation). New demand remains weakest in the higher density sector, with liaison contacts continuing to note that construction costs remain too high relative to selling prices, while detached commencements picked up over 2024.

Graph 2.9
A two-panel line graph showing additions and reductions to the residential pipeline on the left and the number of projects in the pipeline, split by type of dwelling, on the right. The left panel shows approvals and completions have been low compared to the last decade, and that completions have been higher than approvals recently, despite an increase in approvals from low levels. The right graph shows the associated decline in the pipeline from high levels for both detached and higher density, although the decline has been bigger for detached dwellings.

Housing price growth was weak in the December quarter and has moderated by more than expected. This is consistent with weaker housing activity indicators in late 2024, such as the decline in auction clearance rates and expectations of future housing price growth. While the easing in established housing price growth has been relatively broadly based by capital city, there continues to be variation across states.

2.3 Labour market and wages

Labour market conditions are assessed as remaining tight and unit labour cost growth remains high.

The easing in the labour market stalled in the second half of 2024, with conditions assessed as remaining tight relative to full employment. Employment growth has been strong over recent quarters, largely reflecting rapid growth in non-market sector employment, particularly in the health care industry. It is likely that this has contributed to tight labour market conditions in other industries. Market sector employment was flat in the first half of 2024 but picked up in the September quarter (the latest data available). Consistent with strong employment growth and the easing in the labour market having stalled, private sector wages growth was steady in the September quarter. Recent rates of wages and productivity growth imply that labour cost growth has eased but remains above rates consistent with inflation being at target. These key trends in the labour market are explored further in this section.

The easing in the labour market that had been underway since late 2022 has stalled and some key indicators suggest that conditions tightened a little in late 2024.

The unemployment rate edged lower in the December quarter to 4 per cent, around its mid-2024 level (Graph 2.10). That was in contrast with our expectation in November for a slight increase following subdued economic growth. The underemployment rate has been trending lower and is now 0.7 percentage points below its level in May 2024. Other measures of labour underutilisation, including the hours-based underutilisation rate – a broader measure of spare capacity – and the medium-term unemployment rate also declined or were little changed in late 2024.

Graph 2.10
Graph 2.10: A single panel line graph showing the underemployment rate and unemployment rate. It shows that underemployment has decreased gradually from early-to-mid 2024 to be around 6 per cent, while the unemployment rate has been mostly flat, and is currently around 4 per cent.

Employment growth remains strong and has continued to outpace population growth. The employment-to-population ratio rose noticeably over 2024 to reach a record high in December, consistent with labour demand remaining solid in aggregate. By contrast, employment-to-population ratios in peer economies generally declined over this period. The strength in Australian employment growth in late 2024 looks to have coincided with subdued economic growth, consistent with ongoing weakness in labour productivity.

The participation rate – the share of the working-age population either employed or searching for a job – has also reached historical highs, though it has increased by less than expected over recent months. The strength in the participation rate has likely reflected a combination of a still-tight labour market and ongoing cost-of-living pressures. The increase in the aggregate participation rate over 2024 was broadly based across most age and sex cohorts. Longer run trends of higher female and older worker participation have also likely supported recent participation rate outcomes.

Most near-term leading indicators do not point to much further easing in the labour market. The job vacancy rate remains elevated and increased a little in late 2024, pointing to a modest tightening in labour market conditions. Further, a survey of households suggests that expectations for the unemployment rate remain slightly below the long-run average. By contrast, measures of job ads have either steadied or declined slightly (Graph 2.11).

Graph 2.11
A two-panel line graph showing employment growth by sector and GDP year-ended growth. Both panels show GDP growth which has declined steadily over recent years. The top panel also contains employment growth in the non-market sector, which has been above historical levels since 2022 and is at a historical high of over 8 per cent, well above GDP growth. The bottom panel contains market sector employment growth, which has closely tracked GDP growth in recent years. Employment growth in the market sector has decreased steadily since 2022, but increased slightly in the September quarter of 2024.

Much of the recent strength in employment growth has been driven by the non-market sector, but this has affected labour market conditions in the market sector.

The non-market sector accounts for around three-quarters of aggregate employment growth since mid-2023. Employment in the non-market sector, which is primarily made up of the health care and education industries, is typically less sensitive to the business cycle and has been growing strongly in recent years (Graph 2.12). By contrast, year-ended employment growth in the market sector, which is more cyclical, has been much softer, though still positive, over the past year. This is consistent with the observed easing over 2024 in measures of employment intentions from business surveys, which tend to better capture developments in the market sector. However, employment growth in the market sector picked up in mid-to-late 2024 alongside a tick-up in market sector vacancies.

Strong labour demand in the non-market sector has likely contributed to tighter conditions in the market sector. While growth in employment has been concentrated in the non-market sector, and in particular the health care industry, the market and non-market sectors draw from the same pool of labour. The strong growth in health care employment has affected broader labour market conditions, drawing in workers and contributing to tight conditions facing firms in other industries (see Box C: Health Care Employment and its Impact on Broader Labour Market Conditions). This emphasises the need to look at aggregate labour market conditions when assessing the outlook for wages and inflation.

Graph 2.12
A two-panel line graph showing employment growth by sector and GDP year-ended growth. Both panels show GDP growth which has declined steadily over recent years. The top panel also contains employment growth in the non-market sector, which has been above historical levels since 2022 and is at a historical high of over 8 per cent, well above GDP growth. The bottom panel contains market sector employment growth, which has closely tracked GDP growth in recent years. Employment growth in the market sector has decreased steadily since 2022, but increased slightly in the September quarter of 2024.

Productivity growth remains weak, weighing on the growth of the economy’s supply capacity and incomes.

Total labour productivity decreased by 1.1 per cent over the year to the September quarter. Looking through pandemic-related volatility and taking account of recent data revisions, labour productivity is around its pre-pandemic level (Graph 2.13). The recovery in the capital-to-labour ratio has slowed over the past year, contributing to weak labour productivity growth. Over the past year, multifactor productivity – which captures how efficiently the economy is using all its inputs – has also been weak.

Graph 2.13
A line and bar graph where the line shows labour productivity growth, and the bars show contributions to labour productivity growth from capital deepening (growth in the capital-to-labour ratio) and multifactor productivity growth. The recovery in the capital-to-labour ratio has slowed over the past year, contributing to weak labour productivity growth. Multifactor productivity growth (MFP) has also been very weak over the past year.

Wages growth in the September quarter of 2024 was 0.8 per cent, the same as in the March and June quarters and a little weaker than expected.

Private sector wages growth was steady at 0.8 per cent in the September quarter as expected but eased further in year-ended terms. The pace of quarterly private sector wages growth – as measured by the Wage Price Index (WPI) – was unchanged in the September quarter, following a period of moderation as labour market conditions were easing (Graph 2.14). Reports from liaison continue to suggest that some firms are offering larger wage increases than otherwise to attract and retain staff, consistent with tight labour market conditions. However, the rate at which workers have been moving between jobs – as reflected by the number of quits as a share of filled jobs – has continued to decline recently to be below its trend (Graph 2.15). This decline in job-switching has been driven by lower job mobility within the market sector and suggests that inter-firm competition to attract and retain staff has eased. As a result, there may be less upward pressure on wages in the near term than implied by other measures of labour market tightness, such as the unemployment rate (see Key risk #1 in Chapter 3: Outlook.)

Graph 2.14
A two-panel graph with year-ended Wage Price Index (WPI) growth represented as a line and quarterly WPI growth represented as bars. The left panel shows private sector growth whilst the right panel shows public sector growth. The left panel also shows year-ended private sector WPI growth including bonuses and commissions, this series follows the same shape as year-ended private sector WPI growth but is more volatile. The graph shows that for both the private and public sector, year-ended WPI growth has eased in recent quarters after peaking in late-2023. In September quarter 2024, year-ended WPI growth eased more in the private sector than in the public sector.
Graph 2.15
A three-panel line graph, where each panel shows individual agreements wages growth and a measure of labour market slack. The top panel shows the unemployment gap inverted, the middle panel shows the quits rate trend and the bottom panel shows the share of firms reporting labour availability as a constraint. Individual agreements wages growth has eased since its peak, following a decline in the unemployment gap. The share of firms reporting labour availability as a constraint remains elevated. The quits rate has decreased more swiftly from its peak than both individual agreements wages growth and the other measures of labour market slack.

Public sector wages growth has been volatile and was weaker than expected in the September quarter. Public sector wages, which are mostly set through enterprise bargaining agreements (EBAs), typically take longer to respond to changing economic conditions than private sector wages. Wage negotiations in the public sector have often referenced increases to the cost of living over the past three years. Public sector wages growth eased by more than expected in the September quarter, with recent volatility partly reflecting delays around the finalisation of some major agreements. These agreements are now expected to flow through in coming quarters, which would see public sector wages growth pick up in the near term and may also contribute to volatility in quarterly WPI outcomes (see Chapter 3: Outlook).

By method of setting pay, the easing in year-ended wages growth in the September quarter was more pronounced for those on award wages and EBAs. This was largely because the 3.75 per cent annual increase to modern award wages was lower than the 2023 increase of 5.75 per cent, and there were no additional one-off administered wage increases in the quarter. Workers paid under individual agreements, whose wages tend to be the most responsive to current labour market conditions, have experienced a more gradual easing in year-ended wages growth. Consistent with the stabilisation in labour market conditions recently, the quarterly pace of wages growth for individual agreements has also been steady recently.

Unit labour cost growth continued to ease in the September quarter but remains higher than is consistent with inflation being sustainably at the midpoint of the target range.

Year-ended unit labour cost growth eased to 4.6 per cent in the September quarter. Year-ended growth in nominal unit labour costs eased significantly in the quarter, although growth on a quarterly basis tends to be volatile (Graph 2.16). The lower outcome reflected lower growth in the compensation of employees per hour (despite increases to the superannuation guarantee), which outweighed upward pressure on labour costs from continued weakness in productivity growth.

Graph 2.16
A one-panel graph with a line showing year-ended unit labour cost (ULC) growth and stacked bars showing the contributions to ULC growth from labour costs per hour growth, and output per hour worked growth (inverted). It shows that ULC growth has declined in recent quarters, but remains high compared to pre-pandemic growth rates.

2.4 Inflation

Underlying inflation eased by more than expected in the December quarter.

Trimmed mean inflation was 0.5 per cent in the December quarter and 3.2 per cent over the year. The two-quarter annualised rate was 2.7 per cent (Graph 2.17). The easing in the quarter was broadly based but also reflected some temporary factors. Several components experienced faster disinflation in the quarter than expected. New dwelling costs declined in the quarter, after growing at a quarterly pace of between 1 and 1½ per cent since the March quarter of 2023. Inflation for market services and private rents (excluding the effects of rent assistance) also eased by more than expected. The easing in trimmed mean inflation was also partly driven by government cost-of-living measures, as well as an adjustment made by the ABS to the child care inflation series to correct for past errors; we estimate that these temporary factors caused quarterly trimmed mean inflation to be around 0.1 percentage points lower than otherwise.

Graph 2.17
A three panel graph which shows measures of underlying inflation. The first panel shows trimmed mean inflation, the second panel shows weighted median inflation and the final panel shows CPI. excluding volatiles and electricity. Each panel shows year-ended, two-quarter annualised and quarterly growth. Across all the measures, the pace of underlying inflation has eased in the latest quarter.

Headline inflation eased in year-ended terms, mostly reflecting the impact of government subsidies to households. Headline CPI inflation was 0.3 per cent in the December quarter (seasonally adjusted) and 2.4 per cent over the year, down from 2.8 per cent over the year to the September quarter (Graph 2.18). Changes to federal and state government subsidies, including electricity rebates, are estimated to have subtracted around 0.6 percentage points from year-ended headline inflation in the December quarter. Nonetheless, year-ended headline inflation is expected to increase in the September quarter of 2025 to be above the target band as some of these rebates unwind (as currently legislated).

Graph 2.18
This two panel graph shows year-ended inflation (top panel) and quarterly, seasonally adjusted inflation (bottom-panel) with contributions from different categories of the CPI basket. The graph shows that utilities have subtracted from CPI inflation in both year-ended and quarterly inflation in the last two quarters and the pace of housing inflation has eased.

Housing inflation eased in the December quarter, owing to a slowing in inflation for new dwelling costs and rents.

New dwelling cost inflation eased significantly to 2.9 per cent over the year to the December quarter, from a rate of around 5 per cent that had prevailed since the September quarter of 2023. Information from liaison suggests that weakness in demand to build new houses is contributing to builders offering discounts, particularly in Sydney and Melbourne. All else equal, this discounting may have contributed to lower new dwelling inflation than would have been expected based on the elevated, but declining, pipeline of work to be done. Information from liaison partially attributes the weak demand to consumers’ uncertainty around future interest rates. Improvements in labour availability in residential construction have been observed in eastern cities, while trade shortages persist in Perth, Adelaide and Brisbane. As a result, the disparity in new dwelling cost inflation across capital cities remains large (Graph 2.19).

Graph 2.19
This six panel graph shows new dwelling cost inflation by six major capital cities. The graph shows that inflation for new dwellings has eased recently in most cities but that there remains a disparity in new dwelling inflation across cities.

CPI rent inflation slowed in the December quarter due to the effects of Commonwealth Rent Assistance (CRA) and the recent slowing in advertised rents growth. Rent inflation – for the stock of rental accommodation captured in the CPI, which excludes regional areas – was 0.6 per cent in the December quarter and 6.4 per cent over the year, down from 6.7 per cent. Rent inflation, excluding the effects of the CRA, has continued to moderate in recent quarters from an elevated level, reflecting the gradual pass-through of the slowing in advertised rents inflation (Graph 2.20). The recent easing in advertised rents inflation is consistent with softening demand for housing through an increase in average household size (possibly due to affordability constraints) and slowing population growth.

Graph 2.20
This graph shows rent inflation from the CPI, alongside advertised rent price growth, in year-ended terms. CPI rent inflation picked up over the last 3 years to a fairly strong pace and has since slowed a little. Advertised rent growth picked up stronger before this, but has recently slowed significantly.

Services inflation moderated further in the December quarter.

Market services inflation (excluding domestic travel and telecommunications) eased by more than expected but remained elevated at 4.1 per cent over the year to the December quarter. This disinflation has been broadly based across different types of market services (Graph 2.21). However, input cost pressures persist, with liaison suggesting that some services firms – in industries such as hospitality – are having difficulty in fully passing on cost growth to prices, resulting in compressed margins. Easing in insurance price inflation, reflecting some easing of input cost pressures in this sector, also contributed to disinflation.

Graph 2.21
This four panel graph shows different components of market services inflation, with lines showing year-ended inflation and bars showing quarterly inflation. The first panel shows household services inflation, which has declined a little over the last year, but remains relatively strong. The second panel shows meals out and takeaway inflation, which has declined recently towards its average of the 2010 to 2019 period. The third panel shows insurance and financial services inflation, which has declined recently, but remains elevated. The final panel shows domestic travel inflation which was very strong from 2022 to 2023, but was negative in the early part of 2024 in year-ended terms, and is now at a more moderate pace.

Inflation for goods and services with administered prices eased significantly over the year to the December quarter (Graph 2.22). Administered prices are those that are (at least partly) regulated or relate to items for which the public sector is a significant provider. The easing was partially driven by discretionary government subsidies for electricity, public transportation, and motor vehicle registration, as well as a one-off correction from the ABS to address errors in the treatment of child care subsidies made in earlier CPI releases.

Graph 2.22
This graph shows the contributions of various components to year-ended administered price inflation. The graph shows that declines in utilities prices has contributed to a weakening of administered price inflation in recent outcomes.

Retail goods inflation picked up in the December quarter.

Inflation for retail goods picked up in the December quarter and is above its average rate of recent decades. The increase was driven by a pick-up in inflation for consumer durables items. The Black Friday sales appear to have had a smaller effect on price inflation than in 2023, possibly because they occurred later in the quarter. Despite the pick-up in inflation, information from liaison continues to note that subdued demand is making it difficult for firms to pass on higher input costs (in whole or in part) to final prices and that retailers’ final prices do not appear to be impacted by the increase in shipping costs over the past year. The recent depreciation of the Australian dollar could cause the price of imported consumer goods to increase in coming quarters; movements in the exchange rate pass through to import prices and then retail prices with some delay (Graph 2.23). It is too early to see an impact on either import or retail prices (see Chapter 3: Outlook).

Graph 2.23
This two panel graph shows the exchange rate, import prices and retail CPI inflation. The first panel shows the exchange rate against import prices. The exchange rate has depreciated over the last year. Import prices have been increasing, although not as much as over 2021-22. The second panel shows import prices against retail CPi inflation. Import prices and retail inflation both declined since their peak around late 2022, but import price growth has gradually increased in year-ended terms over the last year, and retail CPI inflation increased in December quarter 2024.

Inflation expectations remain consistent with achieving the inflation target over time.

Survey and financial market measures of short-term inflation expectations have declined from their mid-2022 peaks, consistent with declines in actual inflation. Financial market measures of inflation compensation remain close to survey measures of medium- and long-term expectations; unions’ long-term inflation expectations have now declined to be close to the midpoint of the inflation target range (Graph 2.24). Our assessment is that long-term inflation expectations remain anchored at the target.

Graph 2.24
This two panel graph shows long term inflation expectations. Union, market economist and consensus economics expectations are shown in the first panel. Market economist and consensus economics are close to the centre of the 2–3 per cent range, while expectations from the union are a little stronger (but still within the range). The second panel shows survey measure from inflation swaps and inflation linked bonds. The inflation linked bond measure is around the centre of the 2–3 per cent range, but the inflation swaps measure is a little stronger (but still within the 2–3 per cent range).

2.5 Assessment of spare capacity

We continue to assess that there is excess demand in the labour market, but progress towards better balance has stalled recently. However, there are indications that capacity pressures may have eased further in other parts of the economy.

A range of information – including labour market and labour cost data, business surveys and model estimates – continues to suggest the labour market is tight. Also, developments since the November Statement provide further evidence that the earlier easing in the labour market stalled over the second half of 2024 (see section 2.3 Labour market and wages). By contrast, our assessment is that the output gap, which reflects economy-wide capacity pressures, continued to move closer to balance over that period, consistent with the recent easing in underlying inflation.

A range of indicators suggest that the labour market remains tight relative to full employment and that conditions have either stabilised or tightened a little in recent months. Indicators of spare capacity in the labour market, such as the ratio of vacancies to unemployed workers and the share of firms reporting labour as a significant constraint on output, have stabilised in recent months after a period of easing (Graph 2.25). Similarly, the unemployment rate is little changed from the middle of last year, while the underemployment rate has fallen since then. These and a range of other labour market indicators are tight relative to historical ranges (although structural trends can affect the interpretation of these historical comparisons) (Graph 2.26). Based on this broad set of indicators, labour market conditions are assessed as being little changed from six months ago.

Graph 2.25
A three panel line graph showing labour utilisation and constraint measures. The top panel shows inverted underemployment and unemployment rate series. The underemployment rate appears to have tightened, while the unemployment rate has not eased recently. The middle panel shows the vacancies-to-unemployment ratio which has ticked up recently and remains higher than pre-pandemic levels. The bottom panel shows the share of firms reporting labour as a constraint on output, as well as the share of firms reporting labour as a significant constraint on output. Labour as a constraint appears to have increased recently and remains well above pre-pandemic levels. Labour as a significant constraint is also above pre-pandemic levels and has been flat recently.
Graph 2.26
A graph showing outcomes for a range of full employment indicators. There is a set of dots (at the base of the arrows) representing the outcomes for each indicator in June 2024, another set of dots (at the tip of the arrows) representing the latest outcome for each of the indicators and grey shading showing the middle 80 per cent of observations since 2000 for each indicator. The graph shows that few labour market indicators have eased since June 2024 and some indicators such as the underemployment rate appear to have tightened. Many indicators remain tight relative to their typical range of outcomes over the past two decades.

Model-based estimates also suggest that the labour market remains tighter than full employment, with both the unemployment rate and the broader hours-based underutilisation rate remaining lower than our estimates of their full-employment levels (Graph 2.27). The gaps between these series and their full-employment levels narrowed over the first half of 2024, but estimates suggest that no further narrowing occurred in the second half of the year. Estimates of the gaps for the September quarter are broadly consistent with the assessment in the November Statement; however, given the stabilisation we have seen in indicators of labour market conditions, our current estimate of the December quarter gap is larger than was expected in the November Statement. There is substantial uncertainty surrounding estimates of full employment, although each of the model estimates in the suite that we consider implies that the labour market is tighter than full employment. The possibility that our estimate of the sustainable level of unemployment (the NAIRU) is too high is considered in Chapter 3: Outlook.

Graph 2.27
A two panel graph showing a range of model estimates of the unemployment and underutilisation gap. It shows the range of model estimates for the unemployment gap in September quarter 2024 is closer to zero than in previous quarters, but remains negative. The range in September quarter 2024 spans from about −1 to -¼ per cent. The graph shows that partial data suggest the gap is wider in the December quarter of 2024, with a range of −1 to -½ per cent. The range of model estimates for the underutilisation gap in September quarter 2024 remains negative and is also expected to widen in December quarter 2024. The range in September quarter 2024 spans from about −1¼  to -½ per cent.

Outside of the labour market, some indicators of capacity utilisation have eased a little. The NAB measure of capacity utilisation ticked down in January, particularly for goods industries, but remains above its historical average. This suggests businesses are still using their labour and capital resources at higher-than-normal rates to meet demand. Residential vacancies data show utilisation of the housing stock has eased slightly in recent quarters but remains elevated, consistent with subdued growth in housing supply over recent years. Retail vacancies data suggest utilisation of retail property has returned to its historical average, supported by demand in regional centres by large retailers (Graph 2.28).

Graph 2.28
A two panel graph showing capacity utilisation and vacancy rates. It shows capacity utilisation in all industries and goods industries has recently declined, after a period of stability in 2024. It also shows residential vacancy rates remain above the historical average of the series, while CBD office vacancies remains below its historical average. Retail vacancies has returned to its historical average after an extended period below the average.

A range of model-based estimates suggest the output gap was positive in the September quarter but continued to narrow. Recent outcomes for the level of output in the economy remained higher than estimates of potential output, suggesting that aggregate demand continued to exceed the capacity of the economy to sustainably produce goods and services (Graph 2.29). Nonetheless, estimates indicate the output gap continued to narrow in the September quarter, reflecting subdued growth in output relative to potential. This narrowing was broadly as expected in the November Statement.

Our judgement is that the output gap continued to move closer to balance in the December quarter. However, our assessment of the gap is uncertain. The range of model estimates for the output gap remains wide, reflecting differences in how individual models interpret the data. Given that demand and supply appear closer to balance, and the substantial uncertainty surrounding the estimates, it is becoming more difficult to assess the sign of the output gap.

Graph 2.29
A one panel graph showing a range of model estimates of the output gap. It shows the range of model estimates for the September quarter 2024 crosses zero, but is for the most part positive. The range in September quarter 2024 spans from about −1 to 1¾ per cent.

Declining housing inflation and downward pressure on firms’ margins could help reconcile a tight labour market and strong unit labour cost growth with the recent easing in underlying inflation.

While there is uncertainty around our assessments of both the labour market and output gaps, the different signals they are giving about spare capacity over the second half of 2024 suggest that capacity pressures outside of the labour market may have eased, for example in the housing sector or within firms in some industries. Relatedly, it is possible that a decline in profit margins could reconcile strong unit labour cost growth with the recent easing in underlying inflation.

Declining housing inflation has been a significant driver of the recent moderation in underlying CPI inflation (see section 2.4 Inflation). This largely reflects weaker underlying demand for housing (see section 2.2 Domestic economic activity). The recent increase in average household size and easing in population growth have caused a slowing in rental inflation, while the decline in new dwellings inflation reflects the balance of demand and supply in that sector, rather than in the economy as a whole. As such, conditions in the housing sector can help to account for a decline in inflation despite continued tightness in the labour market.

Firms in the market sector have faced weak growth in demand and may not have been able to fully pass through increases in input costs. Firms’ labour costs, and some non-labour input costs, increased strongly over the past year, partly reflecting stronger conditions in the non-market sector. However, weak demand growth facing firms in the market sector may have limited the extent to which they can pass these costs through to output prices. While there are limited data on firms’ margins in aggregate, evidence from liaison and business surveys provides some support for margins having been compressed.

Alternatively, easing inflation could be telling us that the labour market is not as tight as implied by our central estimate of the NAIRU. Estimates of the extent of spare capacity in the labour market and broader economy are inherently uncertain. Our assessment draws on a range of information that supports the view that the labour market is tight. However, there is a risk that we have misjudged the extent of excess demand in the labour market. This possibility, and its implications for the outlook, is explored in detail in Key risk #1 in Chapter 3: Outlook.