RDP 2023-04: Can We Use High-frequency Yield Data to Better Understand the Effects of Monetary Policy and Its Communication? Yes and No! Appendix B: Additional Results
May 2023
- Download the Paper 1.43MB
Baseline sample | Orthogonalised | No GFC | Bootstrapped | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Action shock(a) | 9.84 | 6.62 | 7.68 | 8.89 |
Path shock(b) | 0.14 | 0.34 | 0.32 | 1.31 |
Premia shock(b) | 1.46 | 1.73 | 0.08 | 2.05 |
3-month OIS change(a) | 9.21 | na | na | na |
24-month yield change(a) | 8.32 | na | na | na |
Action shock – quarterly(a) | 15.37 | na | 3.96 | na |
Path shock – quarterly(b) | 1.77 | na | 0.47 | na |
Premia shock – quarterly(b) | 2.12 | na | 0.56 | na |
Action shock – all events(a) | 13.32 | na | na | 14.03 |
Path shock – all events(b) | 0.90 | na | na | 1.01 |
Premia shock – all events(b) | 1.82 | na | na | 7.01 |
Notes: (a) Instrumenting for first principal component of yield curve. (b) Instrumenting for second principal component of yield curve. |